1
Member Introductions / Re: New to the group - hello
« on: March 30, 2016, 01:39:54 PM »
you're right Tom - the 67 (and 69) would be CAM-T (got caught up with a -C build elsewhere). The '67 is legal and perfect for the class but the '89 is missing the interior (and under powered, under dampened, and under tired). As most folks are, I am worried that CAM gets blown up over the next year or so as the "more" purpose built cars come out of the woodwork. The concept of the class is great, unfortunately competition sometimes pushes concepts away from the original intent (i.e. Mike Dusold's Camaro - and don't get me wrong, Mike and I are friends and he is a great guy but the car really pushes the envelope for the class although it is strictly legal). That's why I prefer to have fun and let other folks worry about jackets (I know, not CAM applicable) and the like.